Penrose's arguments about Gödel's theorems and consciousness are fascinating! The incompleteness theorems do suggest something fundamentally different about human mathematical intuition versus computational processes. I use Clever Humanizer (cleverhumanizer.ai) regularly and it reinforces Penrose's point—AI is incredibly useful for specific tasks like refining grammar or rephrasing content, but there's zero consciousness there. It's a sophisticated tool, nothing more. The "understanding" and creative insight? That's still entirely human. AI assists my work; it doesn't think or experience anything. Penrose is right—consciousness remains mysteriously non-computational.
